|
|
IT Strategy: Avoiding the Bureaucratization of
Organizational Communication
Edgardo
Donovan
ITM 508
Dr. Kathleen
M. Hargiss
Module 2 –
Case Analysis
Monday, February 5, 2007
IT Strategy:
Avoiding the Bureaucratization of Organizational Communication
"
The
process of making sense of all the manifest oddness of how organizations
communicate and use information is singularly complicated by the fact that such
descriptions must be conveyed in the same medium that is responsible for
introducing much of the complexity -- that is, ordinary language. Figures of
speech are so embedded in the framework of our terminology that we are often
unaware that we are using them -- or the degree to which our ideas, reactions,
and formative utterances are shaped by the association of such figures." (Eveland)
Companies
must strive to develop and continuously fine tune their IT information flow
systems utilizing a top-down strategy that is built on a long-term business plan
approach intent on fostering a variety of competitive advantages within the
marketplace. In order to avoid becoming over-more burocratic it is critical for
them to remain operationally nimble by allowing their front-line operational
departments enough freedom of initiative to fine tune enterprise-wide processes
so that may quickly adapt to potential sudden changes in customer servicing
needs.
“Eighty-eight
per cent of managers and directors believe that a free flow of information is
vital to the success of their businesses. Nearly three-quarters describe their
organizations as "information-based". Yet nearly two-thirds of
British businesses have no formal information policy." (Anonymous)
As
companies grow and industries mature it is possible too see what were once
small, nimble, and entrepreneurial companies evolve into large multinational
corporations which at times may mirror large public-sector burocracies. Typically
when this occurs these organizations become more important in the eyes of a
larger number of employees that upon them for their livelihood, attract a
larger amount of shareholders hoping to reap the rewards of larger revenues,
and are safeguarded by state governments which draw from them substantial tax
revenue.
"Almost
a third of
Although
this phenomena is not an intended result, quite often the price for growth of
this magnitude is sacrificing net operating margin efficiency which on average is
not higher than four percent. Although large corporations are able to leverage economies
of scale thereby rendering them more competitive from an acquisitions standpoint,
they are also more likely to become more burocratic and in so doing less
nimble, less responsive to customers, and substantially more risk averse.
Change is much more difficult to enact in larger companies from the bottom up in
part due to the difficulty of involved with building a political consensus with
larger groups of people to change enterprise-wide policy.
Large
companies want to maintain the cohesiveness and dynamic qualities of smaller
organizations while minimizing the inwardly focused burocratic tendencies
whenever possible. Ideally, a large company should position itself so that it
can build on its market share advantage while leveraging economies of scale
while remaining on the lookout for potential technological, competitive, and
customer need changes that could erode its market leadership. Therefore, an
organization should maintain the ability to restructure itself to meet new
missions by listening to its employees on the front lines who are closest in
contact with the realities of the marketplace rather than isolate itself in a
proverbial ivory tower.
Change
is very hard to implement and it is important to have access to clear timely
information if one is going to attempt to do so. This process can be facilitated
by creating an IT infrastructure that can organize the massive amounts of
customer, product, service, financial, logistical , inventory, and competitive
analysis data so that it can be accessed in a timely fashion by decision
makers.
The
information applications used by senior executives should be 75% focused
outwardly on competitor data, technological trends while the remaining 25%
should be focused internally on the critical operational efficiency indicators.
Ideally, senior executives should try to derive strategic policy with that mix
in mind to avoid becoming too inwardly focused. When this happens there may be
a tendency of trying to get the external world to adapt to their processes
rather than vice-versa which can be very detrimental.
The
front line echelon corporate departments should keep a 50/50 mix between
information related to customer service feedback and process efficiency. If
possible, these departments should have the flexibility to make decisions
related to implementing better customer care.
“Today's
business users are often unhappy with the quality and integrity of the
information they receive from corporate systems. The competing forces of
growing data volumes and infrastructure complexity with the need to deliver
accurate and credible data drives the requirement for a trusted information
framework.” (Cunningham)
Companies
must strive to develop and continuously fine tune their IT information flow
systems utilizing a top-down strategy that is built on a long-term business
plan approach intent on fostering a variety of competitive advantages within
the marketplace. In order to avoid becoming over-more burocratic it is critical
for them to remain operationally nimble by allowing their front-line
operational departments enough freedom of initiative to fine tune
enterprise-wide processes so that may quickly adapt to potential sudden changes
in customer servicing needs.
I. Works Cited
Eveland,
JD. GLUE, LUBE, AND MONEY:
ALTERNATIVE METAPHORS FOR MAKING SENSE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION.
Cunningham,
Darren.
The Burden
of Trusted Information. DM Review Magazine 2005
Anonymous. The politics of information
- Logistics Information Management.
II. Works Consulted
Eveland,
JD. Glue, Lube, and Money:
Alternative Metaphors for Making Sense of Organizational Information and
Communication.
Cunningham,
Darren.
The Burden
of Trusted Information. DM Review Magazine 2005
Anonymous. The politics of information
- Logistics Information Management.
Schuman,
Evan.
The CIO Who
Admitted Too Much. Ziff Davis 2005
Finney,
Russ.
The Politics
of Information and Projects. Itmweb.com 2007
Strassmann,
Paul.
The Politics
of Information Management Policy Guidelines. Infoeconomics.com 2004
Iacocca,
Lee.
Iacocca – An
Autobiography. Bantam Books 1984
Ansoff,
Igor.
Corporate
Strategy. McGraw Hill, 1963
Alfred, Alfred. My Years with General Motors. Currency
Doubleday, 1963.
Jackson,
Tim.
Inside Intel. 1997.
Gates,
Bill
Business at
the Speed of Thought. Warner Books, 1999.